Sunday 5 August 2012

Introductory course to the M.A in Didactics of English at Universidad de Caldas

 

This blog gathers brilliant work done by students of the M.A program in the introductory course. You´re welcome to read these initial essays on topics of interest for the students and of possible research  potential for the future.













Carlos Man Ospina Nova
B. A Modern Languages
B. S Psychology
M.A Linguistics
Ph.D Education

powered by free-ebooks.net

Drama and education


EDUCATION: A CRITICAL SYSTEM THAT NEEDS DRAMA
By Olga Nancy Orozco Cañón
Caldas University
     No school without spectacular eccentrics
and crazy hearts is worth attending
Saul Bellow

     Education is the performance of our life. Education in its broadest, general sense is the means through which the aims and habits of a group of people get passed on from one generation to the next. Generally, it occurs through any experience that has a formative effect on the way one thinks, feels, or acts. Drama is the specific mode of fiction represented in performance. The term comes from a Greek word meaning "action" (Classical Greek: δρᾶμα, drama), which is derived from "to do" or "to act" (Classical Greek: δράω, draō). This way, it is true that education seems to be a current system where learners should be trained through dramatic experiences; experiences that involve  their life improvement.
     During children's early years, we realize that students have different needs and we teachers should  make their life better  so that  they   make good decisions about what they can do and the way to do it. Our main goal is letting students  reach a comfortable life to become good human beings; a life that allows them to be part of  higher education.  In most developed countries a high proportion of the population   now enters higher education at some time in their lives. Higher education is therefore very important to national economies, both as a significant industry in its own right, and as a source of trained and educated personnel for the rest of the economy. 

     We certainly know that great improvements have been achieved in the past decade, yet a great deal still need to be reached . And it is time to change the controversial theory that elite members have about education, as Thomas Frey said in The Future of the Education: “They perpetuate the notion that only doctors can understand medicine, only physics can understand how the  universe works, and only teachers know how to prepare students for the world to come”. 
 
     Education needs drama today.  Teachers should  realize  that students need “action” to acquire knowledge. We need people with good ideas, with excellent projects, with open minds to have inventions, experiments, innovations  and most importantly,  people who can have fun and make the world a more pleasant place. Learning by doing must be our purpose as  teachers today.





Friday 3 August 2012

Changing the Future Education: an Old Fashioned Term


                                                                  Jonathan Vela Saavedra

Changing the future of education is a very popular and known phrase, nothing else than that, used by thousands of people such as the government, education Ministers and even professors who are about to retire. Future education is defined as the big impact and change the teaching and learning process will have in our society in the next coming years. Some time ago, government and education experts started to worry about the low English levels students were graduating with after school, so they began to come up with different ideas, methods and approaches in order to change the future of education. Today, in most of the English classrooms professors still think about changing the education, improving the education, but classes are the same from that time ago with unmotivated students, meaningless lessons and even worst teacher-centered classes.  However, government official  insist  the education system has improved and English is taught better than before.   Education has to change now, this is the moment when teachers  have to stop thinking and start acting in order to improve the teaching-learning process, otherwise our education and the illustrious “Bilingualism project” will always be a disaster in Colombia.
First, Language teachers have to understand they are mediators between knowledge and students, that the traditional methods, which make the English teacher an all-dominant authority, are old-fashioned and must disappear now. Some time ago Dewey (1938) criticized the spoon-feeding of knowledge, and highlighted the significance of the learner as an active agent in his own learning process. Later on, he suggested the celebrated term “learner-centeredness” which today, about 75 years later, keeps being just a term since English teachers still plan classes without taking into account students’ needs. They do not even think about the reasons why students are in the classroom or what their purpose is to learn a second language. Sadly, the idea of future education just remains in our minds and it will continue in the same condition unless teachers change their way of thinking.
   After the year 2000, the government got more involved in the second language learning in Colombia, according to Jan Van De Putte, a British Council Colombia and National Education Minister consultant, “due to economic interests (because of opening process and globalization)” and they created a huge project called “PROGRAMA NACIONAL DE BILINGUISMO. Colombia 2004-2019”. It basically consists on the English proficiency in Colombia as a second language by 2019. Today, we are about 7 years away from the deadline and students are still graduating from high schools with Basic English levels, A1 According to the Common European Framework. So, what are language teachers doing at school? Are they implementing new technologies in order to improve the English levels? The answer to both questions relies on the conditions schools work with and the communication breakdowns between government and professors.
Finally, It is necessary to say that “the chalk and cement board are behind” as Diana Carolina Cantillo says in her article “la educacion del futuro”. Nowadays, we have a lot of different materials to enhance the English teaching-learning process, to go out of the classroom and to have motivated students like technology which gives Language students thousands of tools to “touch” the language, to have contact with culture, to work and learn meaningfully.
Education has to change today, Colombian teachers have to modify their mind and stop complaining about “the situation”, you are the ones who make the difference; you are not the centre of the class. Take into account the Humanistic Approach developed during the half of the 20th century or the Communicative Language Teaching from the 60s, the internet possibilities and how useful it may be for your meaningful lessons, change your perception classes are students-centered and nowadays students’ needs are different, the world is different, so the future is what you are doing right now inside the classroom, and only in that way the Bilingualism project and the English teaching- learning process will be completely successful in our country. 












Automation of Higher Education, the matrix needed by the market


                                                                        Rosario Rivera Quintero


The increased use of technology in education is more evident nowadays than before. Universities and educational institutions are investing and rushing trying to implement virtual courses and offering tuition in which technology plays a supreme role. Consequently  universities are going to disappear in the future or at least they will be no longer as we know them today.
It is marvelous how we can have unlimited access to any kind of information or products through internet. People can learn, buy or sell, be connected with other people around the world, know many cultures, work or be entertained through it. We are potential consumers of whatever it comes through it.
Using Internet to have access to any service or information, where people can buy or obtain unlimited services, why not  offer tuition this way? Education becomes then  a very interesting product to be sold. Education is seen as merchandise and a very profitable land for investors and private companies who count on and have a vast target community of consumers worldwide.
If universities tend to disappear in the future as we know them today under the premise that virtual education is a must, so universities have to be ready and start to create the necessary infrastructure, otherwise they will be left behind. They have to be competitive, they have to create a large range of courseware enough competitive to be in force in the market.
And who is behind all this? At the end of the day who is receiving the profits and benefits? Few courseware producers, coordinators, deans, consortiums, hackers, IBM, cable companies, Microsoft? Who is going to control it or regulate it? What is going to happen with intellectual property? Who is going to have the monopoly? What is the role of the State? What is the role of teachers and students? Can everybody have access to it? In this new era, you’d better become an expert creating effective courseware or you will be no longer in the market. Universities had better enroll the best marketing chains or they will die.
It is hard for me to imagine a university interested in only making money, it is hard for me to visualize it virtual, not as a land where people can converge, discuss, argue and create knowledge. It was within a community of philosophers, mathematicians, engineers, musicians, actors who came together and from whom I got a minimum sense of life.
It was there where I could feel them, smell them, touch them, laugh and perhaps share a coffee. Some would say, well you can do the same in a virtual community, or people will find the way, well, for me it is not the same. It was there where I started to be conscious about the others, we looked for changes, we were interested in human beings and values rather than in making money. Universities and we  teachers can benefit from the technology in all its forms, but we cannot forget our role in forming human beings whose ultimate goal cannot be making money.








English changes your students´ lives


Sandra Liliana  Ramos Aristizabal

For many years English has been seen as a barrier. Many people thought it was difficult to learn this language and they did not consider it important in their lives. But the process of globalization, the new technologies, the world of information and the entertainment have urged people to learn English as a second language and to get involved in its culture.

According to an article (taken from http://cedsgt.com/teamblog/education/4-good-reasons-to-make-english-your-second-language/ ) there are four reasons why people should learn English:   scope, communication, availability and simplicity. Most of the information in internet is in English, it is the second language spoken in the world, you can practice it everywhere and it has clear grammar patterns compared with other languages. If you think about this you will start learning English now.

Although in a country like Colombia there are many factors that can hamper this process, we can make our students   think differently and show them the great opportunities English can give them.  I have met many people who have traveled abroad to get an excellent job, better payment and a new life. English can also be the key to find new friends anywhere, as well as it is the best way to feel more connected with the world because most of the information is in English. In fact, in this moment it is necessary to pass an English exam to get graduated from most universities. 



WHAT IS LOVE? BABY DON’T HURT ME


 Teaching to love goes first before learning can take place
                Lexis Johana Urueña Leon

Love is one of the most important things in our life.  We need love to live; our existence was created by love but we have a wrong idea about what love is. Usually we think when we are in love  the other person lives just because of us, we are everything for them; and we think we really love someone when we spend our life trying to make the other one happy.
We need to think who we are, what is that we really want, how we can make us happy. We need to realize that our life does not depend of the others, I am important just because I am, I have to love myself to get anybody else to love me and I have to love even if nobody else does. When we can teach this to he students, when our students understand it and live according with this reflection we might say we have changed the world.

Technology: a Mixed Blessing in Education



                                    Human contact is irreplaceable                                             Karle A. Ospina García

    Technology has played an important role in the learning system, but it can also be detrimental to education. At first sight, web-based resources open  the door to further education for many individuals who lack the conditions to do it any other way allowing  people to gain a degree while still working full-time. However, when people decide to get enrolled in some virtual graduate or undergraduate programs, they miss the chance to interact face to face with others.   
      Supporters of virtual education argue that online learning may be more student centered and it can accommodate different learning styles. To a certain extent they are right since studying in this way represents self-paced learning, while reducing the travel, time and cost for attending face to face instruction. However, this type of learning may represent loss of motivation and high rate of failures and drop-outs, because there is not direct interaction with the professor and other students. 
    Dzakiria (2005)  reveals that one of the greatest problems experienced by distance learners is feelings of isolation, which makes the possibility of a trusting relationship between the learners with the teachers and with other learners difficult. Such evidence is parallel to Walker’s (in Vrasidas & Glass, 2002) discussion of his paper entitled “Is anybody there? The Embodiment of Knowledge in Virtual Environments”, a plea not just for information but also for contact, for human presence... Such isolation according to Simpson (2002) must inhibit, if not prevent “any possibility of dialogue” in learning, and interferes with the learning process.
     Opponents of traditional learning-enforced in the classroom- argue that virtual education allows students to easily manage their assignments and assessment submissions, and evaluate their performance. However; the learning process requires not only the acquisition and management of new information, but also the communication and interaction with others. At this point is important to emphasize the findings of some constructivists such as Vygotsky and Maria Montessori. They stressed the importance of the nature of the learner's social interaction with knowledgeable members of the society. They also stated that without the social interaction with other more knowledgeable people, it is impossible to acquire social meaning of important symbol systems and learn how to utilize them in an appropriate way. Actually, the students can enhance their learning in a classroom, where they get involved in cooperative tasks. Furthermore, they can enrich their knowledge or sort out their doubts with the help of somebody else. Some constructivist scholars agree with this and emphasize that individuals make meanings through the interactions with each other and with the environment they live in. 
Interaction is what makes people better communicators , especially in the academic field because they have the chance to strengthen their personal characteristics such as patience, respect for others, self awareness, kindness, intelligence, tolerance and sociability. Nevertheless, if technology empowers of education, its social emphasis will turn into a more mechanical process and the social dimension will be shifted away.
     To sum up, technology can enhance traditional methods of learning but cannot replace the human touch. Although internet offers many opportunities to succeed in the academic process; the energy and spontaneity of discussion among people sitting together in a small room cannot be replicated by electronic exchanges. People should think about education as a more valuable experience if it is developed in a communicative context.


REFERENCES

·         Dzakiria, Hisham. The Role of Learning Support in Open & Distance Learning: Learners’ experiences and perspectives. Malaysia ,University Utara Malaysia: 2005.

·         Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE April 2005 ISSN 1302-6488 Volume :6 Number: 2
·         Walker, R. (2002) Is there anyone there? The embodiment of knowledge in virtual environments. In C. Vraasidas & G. Glass (eds.), Distance education and distributed learning (pp.99-114), Greenwich , Connecticut : Information Age Publishing
·         Simpson, O. (2002). Supporting Students in Online, Open and Distance Learning (2 nd edition), London : Kogan Page.
·         McLeod, S. A. (2010). Zone of Proximal Development. Retrieved from http://www.simplypsychology.org/Zone-of-Proximal-Development.html
·         Abrahamson, C. E. (1998) Issues in interactive communication in distance education, College Student Journal, 32(1), 33–43.

THE CHALLENGES OF AN INCLUSION POLICY


                                                Paula Andrea Pelaez Velasquez

TO: Principals, directors, coordinators and teachers

The word inclusion is an attitude that involves  listening, speaking, participating, accepting and      cooperative skills.                                                                                              Fulvia Cedeño Ángel



To be included in a group means that a person is accepted by others, of course having in mind he/she has duties and rights to fulfill. The main objective of the Inclusion Policy is that all kinds of  students  have the possibility to attend, participate, learn and develop their knowledge in a common environment. This process is to be accomplished with good practices in the art of teaching and excellence in the outcome of competences in every student. Inclusion has turned classrooms into spaces that are rich in tolerance towards diversity and equitable in understanding and learning processes. According to social perspectives we notice that inclusion also looks for accepting and valuing cultural characteristics. Different  contexts and students’ interests are considered in order  to satisfy needs of a community, whereas teachers have the role of being motivators and facilitators that must generate changes in cognitive and social development.

Something demanding in today’s education is to have students with special qualities gathered all together in the same room, sometimes making extra efforts when trying to become more effective (accomplish a purpose) and efficient (accomplish the purpose the best one can and with the least waste of time and effort). Consequently the process of a meaningful teaching and learning becomes a challenge for public schools teachers, one of them being able to identify students’ abilities and difficulties.   Those with exceptional abilities can help others in a cooperative model and those with some limitations can experiment challenges when reaching some goals. They also will improve values of respect, tolerance, and social responsibility, reasons that will help them to build their self esteem and confidence.

According to Koïchiro Matsuura General Director of UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization) 1999-2009, by the time education systems are developed and improved, they must have to deal to complex and specific problems. They have to accept the facts that the number of students is exponentially growing and that  diversity in communities is enormous and is worldly recognized and defended. 

In order to be optimistic and have good results with our Inclusion Policy, institutions have to modify curriculum structures from a traditional to a creative, experimental and constructive one, pay special attention to practices in the classroom, research, innovate, train teachers to be able to manage heterogeneous classes and making parents part of their children’s education.   



 Paula Andrea Peláez Velásquez
Master’s Degree Student
University of Caldas

The importance of interaction in the classroom in the future education.


Johanna Munoz Pineda.
Caldas University.



The importance of interaction in the classroom in the future education.

The purpose of education has changed dramatically in the last decades. In a global world where technology has become a major tool and communication is fundamental, interaction plays a major role in the classrooms, transforming our schools and the way  we learn and teach. The main purpose of education is to prepare students for the future challenges of the real world. Teachers play an important role influencing and facilitating students’ academic achievement and preparing them for these challenges.

Learning in the classroom has changed, becoming a collaborative process in which teachers bring their experience, knowledge, and expertise along with all elements that students bring with them such as previous learning experiences, cultures, and ideas. Many people agree with the idea that   education is transforming along with the changes and demands of the new global societies, making it way different than education in the past. The use of modern technology as an important tool to facilitate learning shows this new change. In addition, the increasing use of the internet sources, interactive smart boards, and electronic tables along with electronic books and readers provide an instant interface between classroom and cyberspace, allowing teachers to transform classes, these gadgets evidence the impact to technology in today’s learning process.  Technology has made learning more proactive and global shortening distances and giving wide and more global perspectives of different issues.

On the other hand, experts have found that eliminating traditional classrooms in exchange for impersonal online classes would be the biggest mistakes because they say that one of the most important aspects of school life is the social interaction that comes with daily meetings among students. It can be said that future education may have some negative impact on our society since the use of technology is limiting the personal interaction in the classroom. The lack of interaction with teachers and classmates may reduce the opportunity of sharing different points of view in which students can actively engage in the learning process. Moreover, interaction in the classroom is the way  teachers can identify different styles of learning, implementing activities in which students would have opportunities of developing their knowledge through the sharing of experiences.

Finally, interaction plays an important role in today’s education since it provides students elements to succeed academically and socially. Since teachers and students are engaged in an active and interactive process of learning, new classrooms are supposed to provide students with a new learning style through the use of modern technology, working together in a classroom environment where different learning methods and technology are adapted to meet the new challenges of our global world.  



English and Teenagers: The Dread of Many Second Language Teachers


                                                        Sandra Milena Marín Ríos

Nowadays, teenagers seem  have become a pain in the neck, not only for their parents but also for their teachers. but, it is not a secret that at this age, they are neither children nor adults; they are just finding their middle point. In the teaching of second language teenagers are the dreads of many teachers  because in spite of all the teacher’s efforts, they seem not to want anything related to  learning, especially English for  it demands a lot of dedication and concentration from them.

In the past, teachers had the chance to deal with a different kind of teenagers;  more obedient, judicious and a little more responsible individuals. Currently, our teenagers are aggressive, irresponsible and they tend not like anything. They do not want to be in class and often their minds can be on other things, or they are just playing or listening to music with their cellphones, when teachers are giving an English lesson.

However, there are other reasons.  The number of English classes, in our country, 3 hours per week and the low possibilities in our schools to provide the adequate language environment. That is why as  teachers, we have to direct students to the different resources for learning outside the classroom and maybe this way, they could learn much more efficiently by themselves. According to Anderson (2008),  teachers should let students have more choices and begin to take responsibility for their own learning.  Harmer (2003) states; “Get them to write the questions, cut up texts (a bit too primary – like sometimes), write their own grammar exercises.  I mean somehow getting the ownership of the material over to them……put them in the center of the frame”. Harris (1991) suggests many ways on how to get students more “into the frame”. These include; giving them roles to help the teacher and the class, highlighting students in a positive fashion and using rewards.

Taking into account their age, teenagers usually want to get the control over the learning situation. Usually in a classroom, one of them becomes the “leader” and  could help the teacher with some discipline problems, not with aggression toward their partners, but also because that student is part of the group and talk their own language. As a teacher, I have had that experience, that allows that the student feels important, motivated and in the same way he or she involves the others.

For teenagers, on the other hand, to face a second language and the fact of speaking it in public  is so scary for them. So, maybe this could be a little demotivating frustrating and traumatic. Maybe that is the reason why they act toward this new learning like that. Besides teachers need to be more comprehensive and do not demand from the teenagers knowledge that they have not provided.
 Teachers need to ultimately  reflect upon the activities they address in the English class.   They could be more sensitive and try to create a warm atmosphere in the classroom, where the  teenage students   feel comfortable, self-confident and where their social learning  can be taken into account , and  at the same time the dread of teaching and learning  will end up for everyone.

Traditional education versus virtual education


                                                         Mauricio Andrés Manriquez

It has been proved that traditional education hasn’t been very useful for most people, and the main reason is because the learning process has taken place only in classrooms, and also because teachers have been the center of the class.
According to Thomas Frey in his writing “The Future of Education”, we as human beings learn since the moment we wake up and even learn when we are asleep, so with this research we can say that a classroom centric education is not necessary.
In the past the time used for learners to get information was way too much compared with the time they spend now to get the same information with a minimum of time. Also books are cheaper now than before and are easy to get them. That is why many people in the past couldn´t  have  a good education.
Nowadays  education is changing.  Learners have the opportunity to choose virtual education which means that they can learn from the place they want and manage their own time, too and a huge  number of the people in the world with access to the internet could benefit paying little money if compared with  traditional education and in some cases virtual education that  can be free.
According with statistics, virtual education is spreading all over the world and more people are becoming professionals, technicians, and getting master degrees. There is no doubt that you can get more benefits with the virtual education than with the traditional education, and the only things you need  in the virtual education are: a computer, access to the internet and computer skills to achieve your goals. 

A quality teacher or an entertaining one.


A Good Learning Process Depends on a Didactic Teacher, not on an Entertainer

María Eugenia Guapacha Chamorro
Institución Educativa República de Israel
Universidad del Valle

           
Nowadays the teaching process has been criticized by experts in education and even by people who have no knowledge about this field.  To come up with the fast-coming changes and new trends, many (traditional) teachers resort to dynamic and fun activities to make their lessons look more modern without changing deeply or modifying at all their teaching and linguistic views.  They unwillingly fall into a trap, that of entertainment or show business in class.  In this kind of attitude, making good lessons and having the students enjoy seems to be sufficient, for the teachers feel they have improved their teaching and that seems to be corroborated by the students’ liking their lessons.  It must be understood that mere entertainment is not enough; teachers need a sound didactic view to support what they do.
In ancient times, the teacher was considered  a master, a person who had all the knowledge related to his/her field.  Students did not have many options to choose; they were just limited to “swallow” what they got from their teachers.  Other sources and materials were restricted as well.  Close relationships between teachers and students were not necessary for each individual had his/her own responsibility in each process; teachers in charge of their teaching and students in charge of their learning. Classes were not supposed to be fun but hard work; and this view worked well: the students learned. this poses a question: are cognitive and affective aspects important in a teaching-learning process?
Being a teacher deals with several aspects that have to do with education.  A teacher should select an appropriate approach method, and procedures in order to involve and engage his/her students into their learning process.  He/she should be skilled in managing the didactics in his/her area that in this case is teaching a foreign language.
It is here where some confusion arises since many people confuse didactics with dynamic or fun activities.  A good teacher with a suitable didactics in class chooses a set of techniques and develops a plan, contents and methodology for his/her students to teach taking into account the theory and pedagogy.  Dynamic activities have to do with movement and they are close to games. Currently, with the influence of Pedagogy trends, schools and teachers are required to offer a good atmosphere to their “clients” that involves teachers to offer a good education and establish close relationships with students and parents.
In my point of view, this affective component (emotional factors, social relationships between teachers and students) helps learners feel comfortable when studying and approaching teachers.  These affective factors are relevant to build a good relationship but they are not mandatory; what really concerns  teaching is the proper didactics,  not just having fun in class which is not conducive to learning.  
 Many teachers are being forced to change their tendencies; of course if those tendencies are obsolete they need to be updated.  The point is that teachers might be  expected  to become  “clowns” in class, someone to entertain students to make their learning process meaningful and funny.  We do not need teachers dressed up like clowns with a huge red nose, big colorful clothes and long shoes who make students laugh all the time with a marvelous show.  We need creative teachers giving magic classes with new ideas and projects at school; a person who interacts with students and makes their learning easier through activities and tasks for them to solve.  We need teachers using technology in class and really entertaining pupils with fantastic stories and readings and talking about future and culture.  We need teachers who are updated in their field and are qualified to teach.

All in all, what we really need in our schools and universities are teachers capable of defending their point of view related to teaching;  a professional with proper methods and techniques which help their pupils love what they are learning; creative and fantastic teachers with a deep sense of respect for their learners, for their values and learning styles. We do not need merchants of education, liars offering courses and ideas that are not valuable in terms of relevance and educational process.  An effective teaching is not necessarily fun; good teaching is not mere entertainment; quality teachers are not entertainers, a teacher-centered lesson is not necessarily boring, games in class might be helpful but they should not replace meaningfulness and purpose.  A good teacher is an entertainer but an entertainer is not a good teacher; the difference is between means (fun, dynamic activities) and ends (learning).