Rosario Rivera Quintero
The increased use of technology in
education is more evident nowadays than before. Universities and educational
institutions are investing and rushing trying to implement virtual courses and
offering tuition in which technology plays a supreme role. Consequently universities are going to disappear in
the future or at least they will be no
longer as we know them today.
It is marvelous how we can have
unlimited access to any kind of information or products through internet.
People can learn, buy or sell, be connected with other people around the world,
know many cultures, work or be entertained through it. We are potential
consumers of whatever it comes through it.
Using Internet to have access to any
service or information, where people can buy or obtain unlimited services, why
not offer tuition this way? Education becomes then a very interesting product
to be sold. Education is seen as merchandise and a very profitable land
for investors and private companies who count on and have a vast target community
of consumers worldwide.
If universities tend to disappear in
the future as we know them today under the premise that virtual education is a
must, so universities have to be ready and start to create the necessary
infrastructure, otherwise they will be left behind. They have to be
competitive, they have to create a large range of courseware enough competitive
to be in force in the market.
And who is behind all this? At the
end of the day who is receiving the profits and benefits? Few courseware
producers, coordinators, deans, consortiums, hackers, IBM, cable companies,
Microsoft? Who is going to control it or regulate it? What is going to happen
with intellectual property? Who is going to have the monopoly? What is the role
of the State? What is the role of teachers and students? Can everybody have
access to it? In this new era, you’d better become an expert creating effective
courseware or you will be no longer in the market. Universities had better
enroll the best marketing chains or they will die.
It is hard for me to imagine a
university interested in only making money, it is hard for me to visualize it
virtual, not as a land where people can converge, discuss, argue and create
knowledge. It was within a community of philosophers, mathematicians,
engineers, musicians, actors who came together and from whom I got a minimum
sense of life.
It was there where I could feel
them, smell them, touch them, laugh and perhaps share a coffee. Some would say,
well you can do the same in a virtual community, or people will find the way,
well, for me it is not the same. It was there where I started to be conscious
about the others, we looked for changes, we were interested in human beings and
values rather than in making money. Universities and we teachers can benefit
from the technology in all its forms, but we cannot forget our role in forming
human beings whose ultimate goal cannot be making money.
Desde el cristianismo visto como un ejemplo de una primera globalización somos "victimas" del irremediable cambio que impone lo supuestamente mejor, o más conveniente... la "democracia" al igual que las leyes y principios del mercado imponen su nefasta y en ocasiones provechosa "verdad"... la tendencia al ensimismamiento de un auto-aprendizaje puede generar detrimentos en el trato con el otro.... pa´ onde va esto
ReplyDeleteque rico leerte charito